Why our sleep experts loved it
I tried the Bensons for Beds Memory Pocket 2500 Mattress in a Bensons showroom, lying on it in person rather than borrowing it for a home trial. My view stayed fairly cautious. The mattress feels competent, especially around the edges, but the name makes the spring package sound more substantial than it felt under me.
This is a Bensons own-brand mattress, so there is no separate mattress-maker reputation doing extra work in the background. For that reason, the free 5 year guarantee feels okay rather than reassuringly long. The choice of tensions helps it, mind you. Soft, Medium and Firm are available, and that gives shoppers a proper chance to match the feel before buying.
What I noticed on the shop floor
At 33cm deep, this is a tall mattress. It looked bulky on the display base and will raise the finished bed height quite a bit, especially on a divan. The quilted stretch-knit sleep surface had a soft, padded hand-feel, helped by the Truecomfort fillings. Pleasant. No real sense of luxury theatre, though.
The memory foam layer gave some contouring, mainly a shallow cushioning effect around the shoulder and hip. It did not behave like a slow, dense Tempur-style foam, so anyone expecting that deep melt-in sensation may be disappointed. Against the Emma Hybrid, the Bensons feels more traditional and less foam-dominant; the advantage is being able to try different tensions in store rather than relying on an online trial.
The spring count is the awkward bit. Bensons lists 2550 Dual Layer Pocket springs, made up of 1500 mini springs and 1050 full-height pocket springs. The full-height springs are the real support layer. A count of 1050 sits close to the minimum I would accept in a modern pocket sprung mattress with this sort of marketing around it. The 1500 mini springs added a little surface liveliness during testing, but I would not treat them as equal to another full support layer. Good for the brochure. Less dramatic on the body.
How the tensions felt
I spent most of my time on the Firm model, then moved to the Medium for contrast. On my back, the Firm kept my pelvis level and gave a steady, braced feel through the lower spine. Back sleepers who dislike any sag through the middle should understand the appeal quite quickly.
Side sleeping told a different story. The Firm did not give my shoulder enough room, and the hip felt held up rather than properly accommodated. That is where hourglass figures may struggle. Side sleepers usually need sinkage at those pressure points, not just a hard support surface underneath.
The Medium was the more forgiving option for side sleeping. It allowed more compression at the shoulder and hip while still feeling supportive. I would not call it plush. People chasing a soft hotel pillow-top feel may find even the Medium a bit controlled, so the Soft version is worth trying in store before assuming the label tells the whole story.
Who it should suit
The Firm version makes most sense for back sleepers, with some stomach sleepers also likely to benefit from the flatter, tauter feel. Mixed sleepers should be careful, because the mattress can feel sensible on your back and rather blunt on your side. Two minutes in a showroom will not expose that fully. Stay there longer than feels polite.
The Dynamic reinforced edge support was the best part of my test. Sitting near the side produced less collapse than I expected, and lying close to the edge felt secure. On a double or king size, that can make the usable sleep area feel wider, especially for couples.
The traditional flag-stitched handles are helpful for moving and rotating the mattress. This is an Easy Care no-turn model, so maintenance means rotation rather than flipping. Easier to live with, certainly, though a one-sided build gives you fewer options for evening out wear over the years. The 33cm depth also means ordinary fitted sheets may be a tight fit.
What I could not prove in store
This was a showroom test, not a month of sleeping on it. I could not verify body impressions after regular use; night-long heat build-up from the memory foam; partner disturbance in a quiet bedroom; or Bensons’ delivery, returns and 5 year guarantee handling. Those are the areas I would check through owner reviews before paying full price.
My shop-floor verdict
The Memory Pocket 2500 is a perfectly decent mattress to shortlist, especially for back sleepers looking at the Firm tension or side sleepers testing the Medium. The edge support earns praise. The headline spring number earns suspicion. Focus on the 1050 full-height springs, lie right out towards the border, then decide whether the feel justifies the promise printed on the label.
Why you can trust WantMattress
We spend hours testing (and/or researching) every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about
how we test .